As the Supreme Court may be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has long been arrived at, therefore the decision from the Supreme Court needs to be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) with the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more

For legal professionals, there are specific rules regarding case citation, which differ depending within the court and jurisdiction hearing the case. Proper case law citation within a state court might not be proper, as well as accepted, for the U.

fourteen. From the light on the position explained previously mentioned, it really is concluded that a civil servant provides a fundamental right being promoted even after his retirement by awarding proforma promotion; provided, his right of promotion accrued during his service but could not be regarded for no fault of his very own and meanwhile he retired on attaining the age of superannuation without any shortcoming on his part about deficiency within the length of service or within the form of inquiry and departmental action was so taken against his right of promotion. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 433 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

Sign up for E-mail Notification of recent opinions The cases listed below have experienced opinions filed for them within the last fourteen days. The following information is accessible for Each individual case: Information Sheet - Click a case number to view case details, such as signing JusticesJudges and participating attorneys.

2299 of 2025. The findings are pending finalization and will be submitted without delay. In addition they stated that directives for strict compliance have been issued to all Karachi units, with non-compliance experiencing departmental action. Furthermore, they submitted that an existing enquiry is underway. Therefore, They are really directed to complete the proceedings and submit the enquiry report to this court through MIT-II of this Court. 12. This petition stands disposed of in the above mentioned terms. Read more

In order to preserve a uniform enforcement of your laws, the legal system adheres to the doctrine of stare decisis

From the United States, individuals are not needed to hire an attorney to represent them in either civil or criminal matters. Laypeople navigating the legal system on their have can remember a single rule of thumb when it involves referring to case law or precedent in court documents: be as specific as possible, leading the court, not only to your case, but for the section and paragraph containing the pertinent information.

The legislation as set up in previous court rulings; like common law, which springs from judicial decisions and tradition.

Summaries offer concise insights into the legal principles governing agreements between parties, including the formation, interpretation, and enforceability of contracts, providing a precious resource for understanding contractual rights and obligations.

The law of necessity identified and upheld by Pakistan's highest judicial body has proved an honorable protection for military adventure in civil government.it absolutely was the illegal action called law of necessity..

Matter:-DIRECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252210 Tag:The law enjoins the police to be scrupulously fair to your offender along with the Magistracy is to guarantee a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court and also from other courts Nevertheless they have failed to have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The a good amount of this power casts an obligation over the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for any crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.

The reason for this difference is that these civil regulation jurisdictions adhere to a tradition that the reader should have the ability to deduce the logic from the decision along with the statutes.[4]

Where there are several members of a court deciding a case, there might be 1 or more judgments presented (or reported). Only the reason for that decision of the majority can represent a binding precedent, but all may be cited as persuasive, or their reasoning could be adopted in an argument.

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming into the main case, it is also a properly-founded proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether get more info rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of the charge, however, that is topic to your procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, to the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-respect the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings within the evidence.